Search results

Narrow your search

Result types

Showing 1781 - 1790 of 2144 for "Hai Run Law Firm" with applied filters

News & Analysis

Highlighted and key developments of Indonesian investment and M&A regulations

06 September 2019 by Luky I Walalangi

What were the most important legal developments in the last 12 months and how might they affect businesses?

News & Analysis

JunHe Wins the Best Chinese Law Firm of the Year (Gold Award) at ILASA for the Ninth Time

04 September 2019 by Asia law

JunHe was named the Best Chinese Law Firm of the Year (Gold) at the 12th annual International Legal Alliance Summit & Awards (ILASA), which were held in New York on June 27.

News & Analysis

JunHe Welcomes New Partner Ye Yurong

04 September 2019 by Asia law

JunHe warmly welcomes Ye Yurong as a partner in our Hong Kong office. Ms. Ye focuses on capital markets, corporate and M&A.

News & Analysis

THE INDONESIAN KPK’S PERFECT RECORD COMES TO AN END

04 September 2019 by Asia law

From the time it commenced operations in 2003, the Indonesian Commission for the Eradication of Corruption (“KPK”) had never lost a case.

News & Analysis

A Short Review of the Case Guidance System of the Chinese Judiciary

04 September 2019 by Asia law

The Chinese Case Guidance System (“the CG System”) has been a bizarre creature for western legal professionals since it was established by the Supreme People’s Court of China (“the Supreme Court”) in 2011.

News & Analysis

Chinese Court Being more Tolerant with Pathological Arbitration Clause

04 September 2019 by Asia law

On 14 December 2018, Beijing 4th Intermediate Court (the “Court”) upheld the validity of a pathological arbitration agreement which does not provide a seat of arbitration nor does the arbitration institution thereunder actually exist in Chinalight International Trade Co. Ltd. v Tata International Metals (Asia) Ltd. (“Chinalight v. Tata”).

News & Analysis

The Judicial Attitudes toward Tying Practice in China: Commentary on a Guidance Antirust Litigation Case published by the Supreme Court

04 September 2019 by Asia law

The case Wu Xiaoqin v. Shanxi Broadcast & TV Network Intermediary (Group) Co., Ltd., is a typical abuse of market dominance case by the form of typing practice, which was trialed by Xi'an Intermediate People’s Court (“Xi'an Court”) as the first instance court, then by Shanxi Higher People’s Court (“Shanxi High Court” or “appellate court”) in the appeal procedure, and lastly by the Supreme People’s Court (“Supreme Court”) in the retrial procedure.

News & Analysis

Analysis of the difference between non-compete disputes and disputes over infringement of business secrets

04 September 2019 by Zhenghe Liu

Business secrets refer to such commercial information as technical information and business information, which are of commercial value, unknown to the public, and protected by security measures.

News & Analysis

从“塔塔案”看中国法院 对“病态仲裁协议”司法审查价值取向的新发展

04 September 2019 by Asia law

2018年12月14日,北京市第四中级人民法院(“北京四中院”)对“中轻三联国际贸易有限公司诉塔塔国际金属(亚洲)有限公司申请确认仲裁协议效力”系列案件(“塔塔案”)作出裁定,认定应以新加坡为法准据法判断本案中“未明确约定仲裁地和仲裁机构”的仲裁协议的效力,并进而适用新加坡法律认定涉案仲裁协议有效。

News & Analysis

2019年医疗投资并购热点探讨

04 September 2019 by Asia law

2019年医疗服务领域仍大有可作为,互联网医疗重回投资前沿,医药领域热点多发。