Showing 1081 - 1090 of 1269 for "PwC Legal Indonesia" with applied filters
06 September 2019 by
What were the most important legal developments in the last 12 months and how might they affect businesses?
06 September 2019 by
Macau SAR (MSAR) is recognised as one of the most open economies in the world by the World Trade Organization in terms of investment, as it is a tax haven and a free port with no foreign exchange control regimes.
04 September 2019 by
JunHe was named the Best Chinese Law Firm of the Year (Gold) at the 12th annual International Legal Alliance Summit & Awards (ILASA), which were held in New York on June 27.
04 September 2019 by
JunHe warmly welcomes Ye Yurong as a partner in our Hong Kong office. Ms. Ye focuses on capital markets, corporate and M&A.
04 September 2019 by
On 21 June 2018, the Indonesian Government introduced the Online Single Submission (“OSS”) system under Regulation No. 24 of 2018 (“GR 24/2018”) on Electronically Integrated Business Licensing Services.
04 September 2019 by
From the time it commenced operations in 2003, the Indonesian Commission for the Eradication of Corruption (“KPK”) had never lost a case.
04 September 2019 by
The Belt-Road Initiative stands tall as the largest transcontinental infrastructure program the world as ever seen. Cutting across 68 nations and linking together three continents by land and sea, the BRI is a revival of the ancient trade network, the Silk Roads that drove economic growth and development in Asia.
04 September 2019 by
The Chinese Case Guidance System (“the CG System”) has been a bizarre creature for western legal professionals since it was established by the Supreme People’s Court of China (“the Supreme Court”) in 2011.
04 September 2019 by
Business secrets refer to such commercial information as technical information and business information, which are of commercial value, unknown to the public, and protected by security measures.
04 September 2019 by
On 14 December 2018, Beijing 4th Intermediate Court (the “Court”) upheld the validity of a pathological arbitration agreement which does not provide a seat of arbitration nor does the arbitration institution thereunder actually exist in Chinalight International Trade Co. Ltd. v Tata International Metals (Asia) Ltd. (“Chinalight v. Tata”).
