Search results

Narrow your search

Result types

Showing 301 - 310 of 390 for "Gurbani & Co" with applied filters

News & Analysis

KWM and Clifford Chance advise Bank of Guizhou on its IPO in Hong Kong

14 January 2020 by Asia law

JunHe and Latham & Watkins advised the joint sponsors

News & Analysis

DEAL OF THE MONTH - December 2019

09 January 2020 by Asia law

asialaw's Deal of the Month for December 2019 is...

News & Analysis

Haiwen and KWM act on PSBC’s $4.67 billion IPO in Shanghai

17 December 2019 by Asia law

This is the largest IPO in mainland China in four years

News & Analysis


16 December 2019 by Asia law

asialaw's picks of the most significant legal matters in the region in November 2019

News & Analysis

LAWYER OF THE MONTH - September 2019

15 October 2019 by Asia law

asialaw's Lawyer of the Month for September 2019 is...

News & Analysis


28 September 2019 by Asia law

The nominations for the Euromoney Legal Media Group Asia Women in Business Law Awards 2019 have been announced (please scroll down for the full list). On November 13, Asia's leading female lawyers will gather at the Island Shangri-La in Hong Kong to celebrate the achievements of women in the legal profession.

News & Analysis

Matters to be addressed in the future revision of China’s trade mark law

24 September 2019 by Asia law

In March 2018, the trade mark office announced its intention to revise the trade mark law and invited the public to make comments and suggestions.

News & Analysis

Benchmark Litigation Asia-Pacific Awards 2019 – winners revealed

20 September 2019 by Asia law

The winners for the fifth annual Benchmark Litigation Asia-Pacific Awards have been announced

News & Analysis

Zaid Ibrahim & Co strengthens fintech and corporate practice with new hire

13 September 2019 by Asia law

ZICO Law recruits new corporate partner in Malaysia

News & Analysis

Chinese Court Being more Tolerant with Pathological Arbitration Clause

04 September 2019 by Asia law

On 14 December 2018, Beijing 4th Intermediate Court (the “Court”) upheld the validity of a pathological arbitration agreement which does not provide a seat of arbitration nor does the arbitration institution thereunder actually exist in Chinalight International Trade Co. Ltd. v Tata International Metals (Asia) Ltd. (“Chinalight v. Tata”).