Showing 1241 - 1250 of 1865 for "Beijing Gaowo Intellectual Property Firm" with applied filters
10 January 2022 by
SSEK Indonesian Legal Consultants is pleased to announce Mahareksha S. Dillon and Nico Mooduto as the firm’s newest partners, effective January 1, 2022.
05 January 2022 by
The plaintiff Aima Technology Group Co., LTD. and the defendant Dali Haoyu electric bicycles Co., LTD., Zheng Jianwu, Yunnan Aima Technology Co., Ltd., LTD. infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition dispute case, the court held a trial in accordance with the law.
04 January 2022 by
In our earlier publication “COVID-19 heightened corruption risks – A Hong Kong guide” , we forewarned that COVID-19 and the challenges it posed to enforcement authorities, organizations and their workforce would allow corruption to thrive.
18 November 2021 by
Chang Tsi & Partners Press Release
12 November 2021 by
Private equity industry recovered in the second half of the year, saw remarkable growth in healthcare and online office areas.
04 November 2021 by
Climate change has been impacting our daily lives notably in the last few years as we are witnessing extreme weather conditions such as heavy rain, floods, and heatwaves at a global scale.
27 October 2021 by
Chang Tsi & Partners Press Release
25 October 2021 by
One must understand that the patent eligibility of a subject matter such as human gene / gene sequence being a question of law and fact can be decided on case-to-case basis only.
27 September 2021 by
The trademark Reg. No. 12887939 “嘉伦光彩JIALUNGUANGCAI & DEVICE” was applied for registration by Jiangsu Jialunguangcai Pharmacy Co.,Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Jiangsu Jialun Company”) on July 9, 2013 and approved for use in services “Pharmaceutical retail or wholesale services” on May 7, 2016.
13 September 2021 by
In our earlier publication “A sign of things to come: Hong Kong competition enforcement developments and trends”, we reported on the Competition Tribunal (the “Tribunal”)’s imposition of pecuniary penalties totaling HK$3.97 million on 10 contractors who breached the first conduct rule by participating in a market-sharing and price-fixing arrangement in relation to decoration work in a public housing estate.
