1. BEIJING GAOWO IP FIRM represented "Leshida" in defending the rights of trademark objection successfully

Huang Liangfeng raised an objection to Mengzhou Bairun Beverage Technology Co., Ltd.'s application for registration of the "Leshida" trademark No. 45709580 in the 32nd class. Mengzhou Bairun Beverage Technology Co., Ltd. specially entrusted our company to represent the objection and defense of the trademark, and finally succeeded in rights protection.

2.BEIJING GAOWO IP FIRM represented "Zhifanxi" trademark, rejected and reexamined successfully

Hainan Zhifanxi Biotechnology Co., Ltd. refused to accept the rejection by the Trademark Office of the trademark No. 52823486 "Zhifanxi" registered in the 35th class, and specially entrusted our company to act as an agent for the review of the rejection of the trademark, and finally succeeded in rights protection.

3.Does not constitute an approximation! BEIJING GAOWO IP FIRM represented the "KULEIMAN" trademark rejection review and successfully defended rights

Beijing Tongchuang Lantian Cloud Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept the rejection by the Trademark Office of its trademark No.51163056 "KULEIMAN" registered in the 42nd class, and specially entrusted our company to act as an agent for the review of the rejection of the trademark. Due to the reasonable analysis of our company's lawyers, the CNIPA finally ruled that the "KULEIMAN" trademark No.51163056 should be preliminarily approved, and the rights protection was finally successful.

4.Overcoming the double resistance of "complete inclusion of cited trademarks + lack of explicitness", BEIJING GAOWO IP FIRM represented the trademark of "Langshan Roast Chicken" and rejected the reexamination. The rights protection was successful!

There are two reasons for the rejection of the trademark "Langshan Roast Chicken" in this case: "Completely contain" the simple Chinese character trademark of the cited trademark "Langshan"; Lack of significance for the specified service! Under the double resistance, after the accurate analysis of BEIJING GAOWO LAW FIEM non-litigation lawyer, the CNIPA confirmed that the applied trademark "Langshan Roast Chicken" is not similar to the cited trademark, and has the distinctive identification function that the trademark should have. It was finally preliminarily approved, and the case of rejection for reexamination was successful.

5.The stage name of well-known online artist and food blogger has been squatted, and BEIJING GAOWO IP FIRM has successfully defended the rights by acting as an opposition agent!

BEIJING GAOWO IP FIRM was entrusted by Foshan Coconut Information Technology Co., Ltd. to represent the trademark objection case of the stage name "C Mei" of the artist "Tan Jiawei" under her name. After the trial of the CNIPA, due to the reasonable analysis of lawyer BEIJING GAOWO LAW FIRM, the CNIPA finally ruled in accordance with Article 32 of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China: the disputed trademark will not be registered!

1.高沃代理“乐事达”商标异议答辩维权成功

黄良风对孟州市佰润饮品科技有限公司申请注册在第32类的45709580号“乐事达”商标提出异议,孟州市佰润饮品科技有限公司特委托我司代理该商标的异议答辩事宜,并最终取得维权成功。

2.高沃代理“智梵熙”商标驳回复审维权成功

海南智梵熙生物科技有限公司对其注册在第35类的52823486号“智梵熙”商标被商标局驳回不服,特委托我公司代理该商标的驳回复审事宜,并最终取得维权成功。

3.不构成近似!高沃代理“酷雷曼”商标驳回复审维权成功


北京同创蓝天云科技有限公司对其注册在第42类的51163056号“酷雷曼”商标被商标局驳回不服,特委托我公司代理该商标的驳回复审事宜,由于我公司律师分析的有理有据,国家知识产权局最终裁定51163056号“酷雷曼”商标予以初步审定,最终取得维权成功。

4.攻克“完整包含引证商标+缺显”双重阻力,高沃代理“狼山烧鸡”商标驳回复审维权成功!

该案“狼山烧鸡”商标驳回原因有二:“完整包含”引证商标“狼山”的单纯汉字商标;用于指定服务上缺乏显著性!双重阻力下,经过高沃非诉律师精准分析,国家知识产权局审理认定,申请商标“狼山烧鸡”与引证商标不构成近似,且具有商标应有的显著识别作用,最终予以初步审定,驳回复审案件成功。

5.网络知名艺人、美食博主艺名被抢注,高沃代理异议维权成功!

高沃受佛山椰子信息技术有限公司委托,代理其名下签约艺人“谭嘉玮”的艺名“C妹”商标异议案件,经过国知局审理,由于高沃律师的分析有理有据,最终国家知识产权局依照《中华人民共和国商标法》第三十二条规定,裁定:被异议商标不予注册!